In chapters 40 and 41 of the Book of Job, we encounter two of the most fascinating creatures ever described in the Bible: Behemoth and Leviathan. For centuries, scholars, theologians, and scientists have debated a fundamental question: Were these magnificent beasts merely symbolic representations used to teach spiritual lessons, or were they actual living creatures that once roamed the earth alongside human beings?

 

BEHEMOTH AND LEVIATHAN IN THE BIBLE 

Behemoth (Job 40:15-24): In Job 40, God Himself describes Behemoth to Job with remarkable specificity. Several key details in this passage deserve our attention.

• First, God calls Behemoth “chief of the ways of God,” suggesting this was no ordinary animal but one of the most impressive creatures He’d made.
• Second, its tail is compared to a cedar tree—one of the largest, most majestic trees in the ancient world. This description alone eliminates many proposed candidates, including elephants or hippopotamuses, both of which have relatively small tails.

The passage goes on to describe Behemoth’s habitat among the reeds and marshes, its fearlessness even as the river rages, and its diet of vegetation. Together, these descriptions paint a picture of a massive, powerful herbivore unlike any animal commonly seen today.

Leviathan (Job 41:1-34): Even more mysterious is Leviathan, which God describes in extraordinary detail over 34 verses in Job 41. This creature is portrayed as virtually unconquerable. The description continues with details about Leviathan’s impenetrable scales, terrifying teeth, and incredible strength. Most remarkably, verses 18-21 describe an ability that defies conventional explanation.

These verses suggest a creature capable of producing fire or smoke—a characteristic so extraordinary that many interpreters have insisted Leviathan must be purely symbolic. But what if there once existed creatures with biological mechanisms capable of producing fire-like effects, creatures now extinct?

 

BEHEMOTH AND LEVIATHAN: COMMON NON-LITERAL INTERPRETATIONS

Symbolic/Mythological Interpretation: Many scholars, particularly those who reject the young earth timeline, interpret Behemoth and Leviathan as purely symbolic figures. Some suggest they represent forces of evil or ancient Near Eastern mythological creatures adapted for monotheistic purposes. Others view them as literary devices meant to illustrate God’s power over creation.

While biblical literature certainly employs symbolism, the level of biological and behavioural detail in these passages goes far beyond what would be necessary for mere symbolic representation. The text presents these creatures as real animals that Job could observe and understand, not as abstract concepts.

Modern Animal Identification Theories: Conventional interpretations often identify Behemoth as an elephant or hippopotamus and Leviathan as a crocodile. While these are impressive creatures, they fail to match key aspects of the biblical descriptions.

A hippopotamus, for instance, has a tail that resembles a small, stubby appendage—nothing like a cedar tree. Neither elephants nor hippos have bones that could be reasonably compared to “tubes of bronze” or “rods of iron” relative to their body size.

Similarly, while crocodiles are formidable predators with armoured hides, they cannot produce anything resembling fire or smoke from their mouths or nostrils. The biblical description of Leviathan goes far beyond even the most poetic exaggeration of a crocodile’s features.

A CREATIONIST PERSPECTIVE

Biblical Timeline Framework: Young earth creationism takes Genesis literally, placing creation approximately 6,000-10,000 years ago based on biblical genealogies. In this framework, dinosaurs were created on Day 6 alongside other land animals and humans, rather than having gone extinct 65 million years before humans evolved.

According to this view, representatives of all land animal kinds, including dinosaurs, were preserved on Noah’s Ark during the global Flood (approximately 4,500 years ago). After the Flood, these animals repopulated the earth, with many eventually going extinct due to environmental changes, human hunting, and competition for resources.

This timeline allows for the possibility that some dinosaurs or other remarkable reptiles survived into the historical period when Job was written, roughly 4,000 years ago.

Behemoth as a Sauropod Dinosaur: When we compare the biblical description of Behemoth with what we know about sauropod dinosaurs like Apatosaurus or Brachiosaurus, the similarities are striking. These massive herbivores had:

• Enormous size and strength
• Plant-based diets
• Powerful tails that could indeed be compared to cedar trees
• Massive leg bones that could be likened to “rods of iron”
• Preference for wetland habitats where their immense weight would be supported by water

No living creature matches this description as completely as a sauropod dinosaur. Even accounting for poetic language, the biblical Behemoth aligns remarkably well with what palaeontology has revealed about these magnificent creatures.

Leviathan as a Marine Reptile or Dragon-like Creature: Identifying Leviathan is more challenging, particularly because of the fire-breathing description. Several possibilities exist within the young earth framework:

• A marine reptile like a plesiosaur or mosasaur, which had formidable jaws, powerful bodies, and could have had additional features not preserved in fossils
• A creature with no exact modern fossil equivalent—perhaps something like the legendary dragons described across many ancient cultures
• A creature with specialised glands capable of producing chemicals that, when combined, created the appearance of fire or smoke

While we don’t have fossil evidence of fire-producing mechanisms in extinct reptiles, we do know modern biology offers examples of remarkable chemical defences. The bombardier beetle, for instance, combines chemicals to produce a hot, explosive spray. A larger creature with specialised adaptations may have produced effects that ancient observers would reasonably describe as fire or smoke.

 

SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND CONSIDERATIONS

Soft Tissue Discoveries: One of the most startling scientific developments in recent decades has been the discovery of soft tissue in dinosaur fossils. In 2005, palaeontologist Dr. Mary Schweitzer found flexible, transparent blood vessels in a T rex femur. Since then, numerous additional discoveries of collagen, blood cells, and other organic materials have been reported in dinosaur remains.

These findings present a significant challenge to the conventional timeline of dinosaur extinction. Soft tissues and proteins should degrade completely within thousands of years (not millions) under even the most ideal preservation conditions. The presence of these materials suggests these fossils may be far younger than conventionally dated.

Additionally, measurable amounts of carbon-14 have been detected in dinosaur bones. Since carbon-14 has a half-life of only about 5,730 years, it should be undetectable in specimens millions of years old. Its presence suggests these specimens are thousands, not millions, of years old.

Ancient Depictions of Dinosaur-like Creatures: Across the world, ancient artwork depicts creatures remarkably similar to what we now know as dinosaurs:

• Ancient Mesopotamian seals show long-necked creatures resembling sauropods
• Native American petroglyphs in Utah and Arizona depict animals with distinctive dinosaur-like features
• Cambodia’s Ta Prohm temple (built around 1186 AD) includes a carving that bears striking resemblance to a stegosaurus
• Medieval European art frequently depicted “dragons” with features now known to be accurate for certain dinosaur species

Additionally, historical documents describe encounters with giant, reptilian creatures. Alexander the Great’s historians recorded his army encountered great “dragons” in India. Ancient Chinese records document the discovery and use of “dragon bones” (now recognised as dinosaur fossils) for medicinal purposes.

The global prevalence of dragon legends across unconnected cultures raises an intriguing question: Could these stories be based on actual human encounters with the last surviving dinosaurs or other large reptiles?

 

EVIDENCE FOR HUMAN-DINOSAUR COEXISTENCE

Some controversial evidence suggests human beings and dinosaurs may have coexisted:

• The Paluxy River trackways in Texas appear to show human footprints alongside dinosaur tracks in the same rock layer. While these have been disputed, some researchers maintain that at least some of the human-like prints are genuine.
• In Peru, the Ica stones depict what appear to be humans interacting with various dinosaur species. Though their authenticity remains debated, if genuine, they would provide compelling evidence for human-dinosaur coexistence.

More broadly, the ubiquity of “dragon” legends—featuring large, reptilian, often fire-breathing creatures—across cultures that had no contact with each other suggests these stories may have originated from real encounters, not mere imagination.

 

CONCLUSION: BEHEMOTH AND LEVIATHAN

The biblical descriptions of Behemoth and Leviathan, viewed alongside paleontological discoveries, ancient artwork, and historical accounts, suggest these creatures were literal animals that once coexisted with human beings.

The detailed, physical descriptions in Job align remarkably well with what we now know about certain dinosaurs and extinct marine reptiles. Meanwhile, scientific discoveries like preserved soft tissue and carbon-14 in dinosaur remains challenge conventional extinction timelines and open the possibility that these majestic creatures roamed the earth much more recently than commonly believed.

 

BEHEMOTH AND LEVIATHAN—RELATED FAQs

If dinosaurs like Behemoth existed in Job’s time, why don’t we find their fossils in more recent rock layers? According to the young earth creation model, most dinosaur fossils were formed during the global Flood when vast amounts of sediment rapidly buried creatures. Post-Flood dinosaurs would have been fewer in number, making their preservation as fossils much less likely. Additionally, conventional geological dating methods rely on circular reasoning—rocks are dated by the fossils they contain, and fossils are dated by the rocks they’re found in—whichh creates an artificial separation between “dinosaur era” and “human era” rock layers that may actually be contemporaneous.

• Could Leviathan’s “fire-breathing” ability have a natural biological explanation? Several plausible mechanisms could explain Leviathan’s fire-breathing description within natural biological parameters. Some creatures could have had specialized glands producing flammable chemicals that ignited when exposed to air, similar to how bombardier beetles create explosive chemical reactions but on a larger scale. Another possibility involves bioluminescent organs in the mouth and throat that, when combined with exhaled vapour in cold conditions, might create the appearance of fire and smoke. The creature might also have had the ability to concentrate minerals that create sparks when struck together, similar to how some rocks produce sparks.
• Why do nearly all ancient cultures have dragon legends if humans never encountered dinosaur-like creatures? The remarkable consistency of dragon descriptions across isolated cultures worldwide strongly suggests these accounts stem from actual human encounters with dinosaur-like reptiles. Ancient Chinese, European, Middle Eastern, and Mesoamerican dragon depictions share key features—reptilian appearance, scales, often with wings or crests—despite no contact between many of these civilizations. If dragons were purely mythological, we would expect much greater variation in their descriptions across cultures, but instead we see consistent depictions that align with features now known from dinosaur fossils, suggesting a common source in actual encounters rather than convergent imagination.

How could dinosaurs have fit on Noah’s Ark? Noah wouldn’t have needed to take fully-grown adult specimens of each dinosaur kind on the Ark—juvenile dinosaurs would have been much smaller while still representing their kind. Additionally, studies of dinosaur kinds suggest Noah would have needed only about 50-60 pairs of dinosaurs to represent all dinosaur types, not thousands of individual species. Many dinosaurs began their lives quite small (some even hatching from eggs the size of large potatoes), making their accommodation on the Ark entirely feasible, especially considering the Ark’s massive dimensions as described in Genesis.

• Why does the Bible use the terms “Behemoth” and “Leviathan” instead of just saying “dinosaur”? The term “dinosaur” wasn’t coined until 1842 by Sir Richard Owen, so ancient Hebrew had no equivalent word for these creatures. “Behemoth” (from the Hebrew “behemot”) literally means “super-beast” or “colossal beast,” while “Leviathan” derives from Hebrew words relating to “twisted” or “coiled,” both appropriately descriptive terms for the creatures being referenced. The Bible often uses descriptive names for animals rather than scientific classifications, just as we might informally refer to a “sea cow” (manatee) or “killer whale” (orca) rather than using their scientific names.
• If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, why don’t we find clear evidence in archaeological sites? Archaeological excavations typically focus on human settlements and artefacts, areas where dinosaurs would have been rare visitors, if present at all. Most human populations would have avoided areas heavily populated by dangerous creatures like large dinosaurs, similar to how few people today choose to live among populations of dangerous predators. Additionally, the rarity of post-Flood dinosaurs and the rapid decomposition of remains in most environments would make archaeological evidence scarce, with the few potential examples (like the Acámbaro figurines or Ica stones) often dismissed by mainstream archaeology due to their paradigm-challenging implications.

How could extinct marine reptiles like plesiosaurs (potential candidates for Leviathan) have survived the Flood when they weren’t on the Ark? The biblical Flood account only required land-dwelling, air-breathing animals to be preserved on the Ark, while marine creatures would have survived in the floodwaters. Although the catastrophic nature of the Flood would have caused massive extinction among marine life as well, representatives of major marine reptile kinds could have survived the turbulent conditions. Post-Flood environmental changes and human hunting likely drove the remaining populations to extinction over time, just as the Steller’s sea cow was hunted to extinction within 27 years of its discovery in the 1700s, showing how quickly large marine creatures can disappear from our oceans.

 

BEHEMOTH AND LEVIATHAN—OUR RELATED POSTS

• Creation’s Clock: Defending the 24-Hour Day in Genesis 1
• Population Math: The Overlooked Evidence for a Young Earth
• 6000 Years Or 4.5 Billion: How Old is the Earth Really?
• Geologic Dating: Is It a Showstopper for Young Earth Science?
• Mt St Helens: How One Volcano Challenges Geological Timescales