Filled Vs Baptised With the Spirit: What's the Difference?

Filled Vs Baptised With the Spirit: What’s the Difference?

Published On: May 15, 2025

Baptised with the Holy Spirit vs. filled with the Spirit: are these simply different terms for the same spiritual experience, or do they represent distinct works of God in the believer’s life?

The distinction isn’t merely academic—it shapes how we understand our spiritual journey and what we should expect in our walk with God. Unfortunately, confusion abounds, with various traditions offering conflicting interpretations.

BAPTISM WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT: A ONE-TIME EVENT

In the Reformed view, baptism with the Holy Spirit is a one-time initiatory work that occurs at conversion. This baptism places believers into the body of Christ and is the universal experience of all true Christians.

The Apostle Paul makes this clear in 1 Corinthians 12:13: “For by one Spirit we were all baptised into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit.”

In the Reformed perspective, Spirit baptism:

Is not a “second blessing” after salvation but an integral part of salvation itself.
Happens to all believers at conversion, not just some.
Represents our spiritual union with Christ and incorporation into His body.
Is accomplished by Christ Himself, who baptises us with His Spirit.

This baptism is the fulfillment of John the Baptist’s prophecy that Jesus would “baptise you with the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 3:11) and Jesus’ promise in Acts 1:5 that the disciples would be “baptised with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.”

FILLING WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT: AN ONGOING REALITY

Being filled with the Holy Spirit, by contrast, is an ongoing, repeatable experience in the Christian life. Unlike baptism with the Spirit, which happens once, believers can be filled with the Spirit repeatedly and to varying degrees throughout their lives.

Paul commands in Ephesians 5:18: “Do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit.” The Greek verb for “be filled” here indicates a continuous action—be continuously filled.

From a Reformed viewpoint, we’re commanded to seek it repeatedly. It:

Is variable and can fluctuate in the believer’s experience.
Relates to our empowerment for Christian service and witness.
Is connected to our ongoing sanctification.
Can be hindered by sin or disobedience and renewed through repentance.

Throughout Acts, we see believers who’re already baptised with the Spirit being subsequently “filled” for specific tasks and testimonies (Acts 4:8, 4:31, 13:52).

THE ESSENTIAL DISTINCTION

The key difference isn’t about receiving “more” of the Holy Spirit, as if He comes in fragments. Rather:

Baptism is about our position in Christ—a completed, perfect reality
Filling is about our experience of the Spirit’s power—a variable, ongoing reality

The baptism of the Spirit secures our place in God’s family; the filling of the Spirit empowers us for service in God’s kingdom.

WHY THIS MATTERS IN THE CHRISTIAN LIFE

Understanding this distinction has profound practical implications:

First, it frees us from seeking a “second blessing” experience. If we’ve trusted in Christ, we’ve already been baptised with the Holy Spirit—we’re not missing any essential spiritual experience.

Second, it explains why our experience of the Spirit’s power can vary. The same believer who has been permanently baptised into Christ may experience seasons of greater or lesser spiritual empowerment.

Third, it clarifies what we should be seeking. We don’t need to seek Spirit baptism if we’re already believers, but we should continually seek fresh fillings of the Holy Spirit for effective Christian living.

MOVING FORWARD IN FAITH

The Reformed tradition reminds us our spiritual position in Christ is secure through the baptism of the Spirit, while also encouraging us to actively seek the ongoing filling of the Spirit for effective Christian living.

Rest in the completed work of the Spirit’s baptism, placing you securely in Christ’s body. But also heed the command to “be filled with the Spirit,” yielding yourself daily to His control and empowerment.

When we understand these two distinct works of the Holy Spirit, we can appreciate the completeness of our salvation while still pursuing greater experiences of the Spirit’s power in our daily walk with Christ.

FILLED VS BAPTISED WITH THE SPIRIT: RELATED FAQs

How do Pentecostal and Charismatic traditions view Spirit baptism differently from the Reformed tradition? Pentecostal and Charismatic traditions typically view the baptism of the Holy Spirit as a second experience after conversion, often evidenced by speaking in tongues. These traditions generally teach not all believers have been baptised with the Spirit, and that this baptism brings a higher level of spiritual power and gifts that should be actively sought after conversion.

Can a believer be baptised with the Spirit but not filled with the Spirit? Yes, according to Reformed theology, all true believers have been baptised with the Spirit at conversion, but may not be consistently filled with the Spirit. A believer who is living in disobedience or spiritual neglect may experience minimal evidence of the Spirit’s filling while still possessing the permanent reality of having been baptised into Christ’s body by the Spirit.
What do contemporary Reformed scholars say about these distinctions? JI Packer emphasised Spirit baptism is the “initiatory gift” that comes with conversion, while Spirit filling relates to ongoing empowerment. Sinclair Ferguson similarly argues in his work The Holy Spirit that baptism with the Spirit initiates conversion, while the filling of the Spirit is the manifestation of the Spirit’s power for sanctification and service, an experience that should be continuous but often fluctuates.

How does John Calvin’s understanding of the Spirit’s work compare to modern Reformed views? Calvin emphasised the Spirit’s work in uniting believers to Christ through faith, which aligns closely with the modern Reformed view of Spirit baptism. While Calvin didn’t extensively use the terminology of “baptism vs filling,” his emphasis on the Spirit’s ongoing work in sanctification corresponds well to the modern concept of being filled with the Spirit, showing remarkable continuity in Reformed thought across centuries.

Does the Lutheran tradition make the same distinction between baptism and filling? The Lutheran tradition generally agrees with Reformed theology that Spirit baptism occurs at conversion, though they often connect it more strongly with water baptism. Regarding filling, Lutherans also recognise the ongoing nature of the Spirit’s empowerment, though they may be less likely to use the specific language of “filling” and more likely to speak of the Spirit’s work in terms of means of grace through Word and Sacrament.
What biblical evidence shows that Spirit baptism is different from water baptism? While water baptism is an outward sign administered by human beings, Spirit baptism is an inward reality accomplished by Christ Himself (Matthew 3:11). Additionally, in Acts 10:44-48, Cornelius and his household received the Spirit (Spirit baptism) before they were baptised with water, demonstrating these are distinct events, though normally connected in Christian experience.

Can multiple fillings of the Spirit look different in different seasons of life? Yes, the Spirit’s filling manifests differently according to our circumstances and God’s purposes. In some seasons, the Spirit’s filling may produce bold evangelistic witness (Acts 4:31), while in others it may manifest as extraordinary joy in suffering (Acts 13:52) or wisdom in leadership (Acts 6:3), showing the same Spirit fills believers in diverse ways for different needs and callings.

FILLED VS BAPTISED WITH THE SPIRIT: OUR RELATED POSTS

Editor’s Pick

Son of David: How Scripture Confirms Jesus’ Royal Lineage
For centuries, Jewish prophecy pointed to a coming Messiah who would fulfil specific ancestral requirements. Chief among these was the [...]

To the Jew First: Why Must Missions Start With Israel?
When Paul declares in Romans 1:16, “For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of [...]

When God Manifests in Fire: What Does the Symbolism Mean?
Throughout Scripture, God frequently reveals Himself to His people through the powerful symbol of fire. From the burning bush to [...]

The Human Knee: Where Evolution’s Kneejerk Explanations Fail
Walk, run, jump, climb, kneel, squat—all these movements depend on a remarkable piece of biological engineering: the human knee. As [...]

The Big Hoax: Turns Out ‘Junk’ DNA Isn’t Junk After All
For decades, evolutionary scientists dismissed vast stretches of our DNA as useless “junk”—leftover evolutionary baggage with no purpose. This concept [...]

Can We Trust John’s Gospel? Answering Your Toughest Challenges
John’s Gospel is distinct among the four biblical accounts of Jesus’ life. With its profound theological language, extended discourses, and [...]

Resurrection Hope: Why Joseph Requested Burial in Canaan
In the closing scenes of Genesis, we find a remarkable request. Joseph—vizier of Egypt, saviour of his family, reconciler of [...]

Haemoglobin Screams Design: A Miracle in Every Breath
Billions of molecular miracles occur inside our bodies each moment. Haemoglobin—the remarkable protein responsible for every breath we take—executes a [...]

Unsung Witnesses: How Minor Characters Validate Gospel Accounts
In the grand narrative of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection, we often focus on the prominent figures—Jesus Himself, the 12 [...]

Can God Condemn Homosexuality Even If Some Are Born Gay?
Few questions challenge modern Christians more deeply than reconciling traditional biblical teaching on homosexuality with emerging scientific theories about sexual [...]