Three vital tests to evaluate truth claims

Three Vital Tests to Evaluate Truth Claims

Published On: May 20, 2024

The Three-Test Filter for Truth Claims

In our pursuit of truth how can we confidently assess whether a particular claim or belief is valid or not? Philosophers and apologists often point to three key aspects or “tests” that any purported truth should be able to pass—internal coherence, external correspondence, and functional adequacy. Let’s explore each of these vital tests and see why they are important lenses that can help us evaluate truth claims:

Internal Coherence—The Test of Logical Consistency

The first hurdle any truth claim must clear is that of internal coherence or logical consistency. In other words, is the claim free of contradictions within its own principles, premises and conclusions? A logically incoherent claim is self-defeating.

Illustration: Imagine someone claimed “There are no truths”: this statement fails the internal coherence test because it contradicts itself. If there are no truths, the very statement “there are no truths” cannot be true. An inconsistent claim such as this is irrational by nature.

External Correspondence—The Test of Factual Alignment

Even if a claim is internally coherent, it must still pass the test of external correspondence by aligning with objective, empirical reality. A truth claim may be logically consistent but still fail to accurately map to facts about the physical world, observable evidence or existing knowledge.

Illustration: Someone could construct an imaginative fantasy story with internally consistent fiction rules and characters. But if this story contradicts established facts about physics, history or verifiable data, it fails the external correspondence test for truth in those areas contrary to known realities.

Functional Adequacy—The Test of Liveability

The final vital test is that of functional adequacy, asking whether a belief or truth claim can be consistently lived out and provide a coherent, flourishing framework for human existence. A truth claim may be logically consistent and align with facts, but if embracing it renders life itself incomprehensible or destructive, its truth value is greatly undermined.

Illustration: A worldview or philosophy that denies objective morality, human rights or intrinsic human value may seem internally coherent on paper. But when applied fully, it enables horrific evils, dehumanisation and social chaos that contradicts our fundamental moral intuitions and experience of human thriving. Such a view fails this test of functional adequacy.

Any robust truth claim must be able to withstand scrutiny on all three of these tests—logical consistency, factual correspondence, and real-world liveability. Running proposed truth statements through this triple filter helps expose contradictions and errors while validating genuine knowledge about reality.

As we evaluate truth claims in philosophy, science, ethics, religion and every arena of life, wisely applying these three tests can save us from falling into deception, delusion or destructive falsehoods. Prioritising internal coherence, external correspondence and functional adequacy puts us on surer footing to discern truth from fiction.

Related Reads

Editor’s Pick
  • The Holy Spirit’s indwelling
    The Holy Spirit’s Indwelling: How Can I Be Sure I Have It?

    “Am I truly saved? How can I know for certain that the Holy Spirit lives within me?” If you’ve wrestled [...]

  • Did Mary Remain a Virgin?
    Did Mary Remain a Virgin? A Biblical Case Against Perpetual Virginity

    The question of Mary’s perpetual virginity has divided Christians for centuries. While Catholic and Orthodox traditions affirm Mary remained a [...]

  • Occam’s Razor
    Is Occam’s Razor a Compelling Argument Against Theism?

    WHY THE ARGUMENT ACTUALLY POINTS TO GOD   Picture this: You're in a coffee shop debate with a confident sceptic [...]

  • Justification in the Old Testament
    Is the Doctrine of Justification in the Old Testament?

    WAS PAUL INVENTING SOMETHING NEW OR REVEALING SOMETHING ANCIENT? Picture this scene: You’re discussing faith with a thoughtful sceptic who [...]

  • General and Special Revelation
    How God Reveals Himself to Us: General and Special Revelation

    Every human heart carries an undeniable longing to know ultimate truth—to understand our place in the universe and the longing [...]

  • Doctrine of God and Bible Interpretation
    Doctrine of God and Bible Interpretation: Are The Two Connected?

    Picture this: Two seasoned pastors read the same verse about God's sovereignty and human responsibility. One concludes God determines all [...]

  • Not Peace But a Sword
    What Did Jesus Mean: ‘I Bring Not Peace But a Sword’?

    Jesus’ statement may sound perplexing to us at first read: "Do not think that I have come to bring peace [...]

  • Nine Marks of Those Jesus Calls Blessed
    The Beatitudes: The Nine Marks of Those Jesus Calls Blessed

    When Jesus climbed that hillside in Galilee and began to speak, He turned the world's understanding of blessing upside down. [...]

  • Why Jesus Calls Mourning a Blessing
    Sacred Sorrow: Why Jesus Calls Mourning a Blessing

    MAKING SENSE OF THE DIVINE PARADOX IN MATTHEW 5:4 When Jesus declared, “Blessed are those who mourn, for they will [...]

  • ‘Sell Everything You Have'
    ‘Sell Everything You Have…’: Are We To Do So Literally?

    When Jesus encountered the rich young ruler in Matthew 19:21, His words cut through with startling clarity: “If you want [...]