‘I Am’ or ‘I Am He’?

Did Jesus Declare ‘I Am’ or ‘I Am He’? And Why Does It Matter?

Published On: April 28, 2025

UNPACKING JESUS’ DIVINE SELF-DECLARATION IN JOHN’S GOSPEL

When Jesus stood in the Garden of Gethsemane facing an armed crowd coming to arrest Him, He asked whom they sought. “Jesus of Nazareth,” they replied. His response—just two words in Greek—was so powerful that it knocked an entire detachment of soldiers to the ground.

What exactly did Jesus say? Was it simply “I am he” (identifying Himself as the Jesus they sought), or was it the more profound divine declaration “I AM”? Let’s explore why the answer has far-reaching implications for our understanding of who Jesus claimed to be.

 

THE GREEK TEXT EXAMINED

In John 8:58, Jesus makes one of His most striking statements: “Before Abraham was, I am” (ESV). The Greek reads “prin Abraam genesthai egō eimi.”

Notice the deliberate contrast in verbs. Abraham “came into being” (genesthai), but Jesus did not say “before Abraham was, I was.” Instead, He used the present tense “I am” (egō eimi)—without a predicate—and transcending the limitations of time altogether.

Similarly, in John 18:5, when the soldiers came to arrest Him, Jesus again used those same words: egō eimi. While many English translations render this as “I am he” for readability, the Greek text simply has “I am.”

RC Sproul, the influential Reformed theologian, puts it powerfully: “When Jesus makes statements beginning with ‘I am,’ He is taking the covenant name of God on His own lips… This is not a case of bad grammar. It’s a case of a statement that transcends time, where there is no past, present, or future with the eternal God.”

 

THE DIVINE NAME CONNECTION

To grasp the full weight of Jesus’s words, we must return to Exodus 3:14, where God reveals His name to Moses as “I AM WHO I AM” (ehyeh asher ehyeh in Hebrew). When this was translated into Greek in the Septuagint, the phrase “egō eimi ho ōn” was used, incorporating the same “egō eimi” (I am) formula that Jesus employed.

By using these specific words, Jesus wasn’t merely identifying Himself to the soldiers; He was deliberately echoing the divine name, claiming for Himself the very identity of YHWH.

DA Carson, the respected Reformed New Testament scholar, explains: “The absolute use of ‘I am’ (without a predicate) in such contexts is not merely a mark of self-identification but an identification with the God who defines Himself as ‘I AM WHO I AM’… This is nothing less than the assumption of the divine name.”

 

THE REACTIONS TO JESUS’ “I AM” DECLARATIONS

In both instances where Jesus declared “I AM,” the reactions of His audience were immediate and revealing.

In John 8:58-59, after Jesus proclaimed, “Before Abraham was, I am,” we read: “So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.” The Jewish leaders understood exactly what Jesus was claiming. They didn’t see His statement as merely confusing or grammatically incorrect—they recognised it as blasphemy, as a man making Himself equal with God. Their response of attempting to stone Him (the prescribed punishment for blasphemy) confirms they heard His words as a divine self-identification.

Similarly, in the Gethsemane scene of John 18:5-6: “When Jesus said to them, ‘I am,’ they drew back and fell to the ground.”

This wasn’t a group of timid individuals but Roman soldiers and temple guards—men accustomed to intimidation and violence. Yet at Jesus’ simple declaration, they were physically overwhelmed. No weapons were drawn. No threats were made. Just two words: “I AM.”

These powerful reactions—attempted stoning by the religious leaders and involuntary prostration by armed soldiers—underscore what Jesus’ contemporaries recognised—even if unconsciously—the divine authority in His self-declaration. He was revealing Himself not just as Jesus of Nazareth but as the eternal God incarnate.

 

THEOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS FROM A REFORMED PERSPECTIVE

This understanding of Jesus’s “I AM” declarations aligns perfectly with Reformed theology’s high Christology, which emphasises several key doctrines:

  • Christ’s Full Divinity: Jesus is not merely godlike or divinely appointed; He is fully God, sharing the divine essence with the Father.
  • Christ’s Eternal Nature: As the “I AM,” Jesus exists outside time’s constraints—He did not come into being but has always existed.
  • Divine Sovereignty: Even in His apparent vulnerability, Jesus remained completely sovereign. His arrest was not something that happened to Him but something He permitted according to the divine plan.

Dr James White, Reformed apologist, notes: “Jesus’s use of ‘egō eimi’ represents one of the clearest self-identifications with Yahweh in all of Scripture. Far from being a mere linguistic curiosity, it stands as a testimony to the deity of Christ that cannot be reasonably denied.”

 

THE VOLUNTARY SACRIFICE

This sovereignty is made explicit elsewhere in John’s Gospel when Jesus declares, “No one takes [my life] from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10:18).

The scene in Gethsemane powerfully illustrates this truth. The soldiers fell back at His word, demonstrating they had no power to take Him unless He permitted it. Jesus was not swept along by circumstances or trapped by His enemies. Each step toward the cross was taken deliberately, in perfect fulfillment of the Father’s redemptive plan.

From a Reformed perspective, this highlights the doctrines of particular redemption and God’s sovereign grace. Christ’s sacrifice was not a reaction to human sin but part of God’s eternal decree. The One who declared “I AM” in the garden went willingly to Calvary, not as a victim but as the victor who would conquer sin and death.

 

APPLICATION FOR BELIEVERS TODAY

Understanding Jesus declared “I AM” rather than simply “I am he” transforms how we approach Him:

  1. We worship Him as God incarnate, not merely as a great teacher or prophet.
  2. We trust His sovereign control over every circumstance, knowing that the One who commanded the soldiers in Gethsemane rules over all our situations today.
  3. We find assurance in His eternal nature, recognizing that our salvation rests not on a created being but on the eternal God Himself.
  4. We respond with grateful obedience, understanding that the One who gave Himself for us deserves our complete allegiance.

 

CONCLUSION: ‘I AM’ OR ‘I AM HE’

When Jesus declared “I AM” in John 8:58 and 18:5, He was making a profound theological statement that reverberated through the cosmos. He wasn’t merely identifying Himself as Jesus of Nazareth but claiming the divine name and nature. This declaration was so powerful it physically overwhelmed those who heard it.

For believers today, especially in the Reformed tradition, these passages serve as cornerstones for our understanding of Christ’s deity, sovereignty, and sacrificial love. The eternal “I AM” entered time and space, not as a helpless victim of human schemes, but as the sovereign Lord who laid down His life according to His own purpose and will.

 

‘I AM’ OR ‘I AM HE’—RELATED FAQs

Are there other “I AM” statements in John’s Gospel? Yes, Jesus makes seven metaphorical “I AM” statements in John (I am the bread of life, light of the world, gate, good shepherd, resurrection and life, way/truth/life, and true vine). These statements, along with the absolute “I AM” declarations we’ve examined, form a significant theological pattern throughout John’s Gospel that emphasises Christ’s divinity and His role in salvation.

  • How do non-Reformed traditions interpret these passages? Some non-Reformed traditions may emphasise different aspects of these passages or interpret them through different theological frameworks. For instance, some Arminian scholars might focus more on the human response to Christ’s revelation, while some liberal theologians might view these “I AM” statements as later theological developments rather than Jesus’s actual words. The Reformed perspective maintains these are authentic declarations of Christ’s deity and sovereignty.
  • Could Jesus’s words be translated differently? While some scholars suggest alternative translations, the context of both passages strongly supports the divine significance of “egō eimi.” The absence of a predicate, the reactions of listeners, and the parallels with Exodus 3:14 all indicate Jesus was deliberately echoing the divine name. Reformed scholarship emphasises the importance of interpreting these statements within their full biblical context.

How does this understanding affect our view of the Trinity? Jesus’s “I AM” declarations provide crucial evidence for the doctrine of the Trinity by affirming Jesus shares the divine identity while remaining distinct from the Father. Reformed theology maintains these passages show Jesus claiming the divine name for Himself without contradicting monotheism, which supports the understanding that God exists as three persons in one essence. This forms an essential foundation for the doctrine of the Trinity.

  • Why would God allow Himself to be arrested and crucified? From a Reformed perspective, Christ’s willing submission to arrest and crucifixion demonstrates both God’s sovereign plan and His incomprehensible love. The eternal decree of God included the Son’s incarnation and sacrifice as the means of redemption for the elect. Jesus’ demonstration of power before His arrest (causing the soldiers to fall) confirms His subsequent suffering was entirely voluntary and purposeful.
  • What does this mean for our understanding of Scripture’s inspiration? The careful preservation of these Greek phrases and their theological significance supports the Reformed view of Scripture as the divinely inspired and inerrant Word of God. The Holy Spirit guided the apostle John to record these precise words and their contexts to reveal Christ’s divine nature. This underscores our confidence in Scripture as God’s authoritative revelation.

How should these passages shape our worship? These passages should elevate our worship by reminding us that in Jesus, we encounter not a created being but the eternal “I AM.” Reformed worship emphasises God’s transcendence and glory while recognising His gracious condescension in Christ. When we pray to Jesus or sing His praises, we’re addressing the same divine being who revealed Himself at the burning bush and knocked soldiers to the ground with His word.

 

‘I AM’ OR ‘I AM HE’—OUR RELATED POSTS

Editor’s Pick
  • Inscription on Jesus’ Cross
    What Did the Inscription on Jesus’ Cross Really Say?

    A REFORMED RESPONSE TO CLAIMS OF GOSPEL CONTRADICTIONS Sceptics love to point out what they see as a glaring contradiction [...]

  • Rooster Crow at Peter’s Denial
    How Many Times Did the Rooster Crow at Peter’s Denial?

    THE CHALLENGE When sceptics want to undermine Scripture’s reliability, they often point to Peter’s denial as Exhibit A for supposed [...]

  • Biblical and Systematic Theology
    Biblical and Systematic Theology: Why Do We Need Both?

    TWO LENSES, ONE TRUTH Picture this familiar scene: A seminary student sits in the library, torn between two stacks of [...]

  • The Anointed Ones in Zechariah
    The Mysterious Two: Who Are the Anointed Ones in Zechariah?

    Picture this: a golden lampstand blazing with light, flanked by two olive trees that pour oil directly into the lamp’s [...]

  • Regeneration or Faith
    Regeneration Or Faith? Which Comes First in Salvation?

    In the moment of salvation, does God regenerate our hearts first, or do we believe first? How we answer this [...]

  • Interracial Marriages
    Interracial Marriages: Does God Frown On Them?

    The question hits close to home for many Christian couples and families today. As our churches become increasingly diverse, believers [...]

  • Because Angels Are Watching
    ‘Because Angels Are Watching’: What Does 1 Corinthians 11:10 Mean?

    “For this reason the woman ought to have authority on her head, because of the angels” (1 Corinthians 11:10, ESV). [...]

  • Does God Torment Saul?
    Why Does God Torment Saul With An Evil Spirit?

    Would a holy God send an evil spirit to torment someone? This theological puzzle confronts us in the biblical account [...]

  • 1 Timothy 2:12 Explained
    Paul’s Teaching on Women’s Roles: 1 Timothy 2:12 Explained

    YARBROUGH’S BIBLICAL CASE FOR COMPLEMENTARIANISM In a world of shifting cultural values, few biblical texts generate as much discussion as [...]

  • The Flesh
    What Does the Bible Really Mean By ‘The Flesh’?

    8The phrase "the flesh" appears over 150 times in the New Testament, making it one of the most significant theological [...]