Three Vital Tests to Evaluate Truth Claims
The Three-Test Filter for Truth Claims
In our pursuit of truth how can we confidently assess whether a particular claim or belief is valid or not? Philosophers and apologists often point to three key aspects or “tests” that any purported truth should be able to pass—internal coherence, external correspondence, and functional adequacy. Let’s explore each of these vital tests and see why they are important lenses that can help us evaluate truth claims:
Internal Coherence—The Test of Logical Consistency
The first hurdle any truth claim must clear is that of internal coherence or logical consistency. In other words, is the claim free of contradictions within its own principles, premises and conclusions? A logically incoherent claim is self-defeating.
Illustration: Imagine someone claimed “There are no truths”: this statement fails the internal coherence test because it contradicts itself. If there are no truths, the very statement “there are no truths” cannot be true. An inconsistent claim such as this is irrational by nature.
External Correspondence—The Test of Factual Alignment
Even if a claim is internally coherent, it must still pass the test of external correspondence by aligning with objective, empirical reality. A truth claim may be logically consistent but still fail to accurately map to facts about the physical world, observable evidence or existing knowledge.
Illustration: Someone could construct an imaginative fantasy story with internally consistent fiction rules and characters. But if this story contradicts established facts about physics, history or verifiable data, it fails the external correspondence test for truth in those areas contrary to known realities.
Functional Adequacy—The Test of Liveability
The final vital test is that of functional adequacy, asking whether a belief or truth claim can be consistently lived out and provide a coherent, flourishing framework for human existence. A truth claim may be logically consistent and align with facts, but if embracing it renders life itself incomprehensible or destructive, its truth value is greatly undermined.
Illustration: A worldview or philosophy that denies objective morality, human rights or intrinsic human value may seem internally coherent on paper. But when applied fully, it enables horrific evils, dehumanisation and social chaos that contradicts our fundamental moral intuitions and experience of human thriving. Such a view fails this test of functional adequacy.
Any robust truth claim must be able to withstand scrutiny on all three of these tests—logical consistency, factual correspondence, and real-world liveability. Running proposed truth statements through this triple filter helps expose contradictions and errors while validating genuine knowledge about reality.
As we evaluate truth claims in philosophy, science, ethics, religion and every arena of life, wisely applying these three tests can save us from falling into deception, delusion or destructive falsehoods. Prioritising internal coherence, external correspondence and functional adequacy puts us on surer footing to discern truth from fiction.
Related Reads
Editor’s Pick
A Royal Priesthood: Why Does Peter Address Believers Thus?
The Apostle Peter’s words in 1 Peter 2:9 are striking: they include one of the most profound declarations of Christian [...]
Job’s Many Trials: What Purposes Did They Serve in the End?
The Book of Job is one of Scripture’s most profound explorations of human suffering and divine purpose. Through the devastating [...]
Geologic Dating: Is It a Showstopper for Young Earth Science?
Are Millions of Years Written in Stone? When you pick up a rock, you're holding a piece of Earth's history [...]
Human Immunology: Evidence of Design in Our Defence Systems
The human immune system is one of the most remarkable examples of biological complexity in nature. As our understanding of [...]
The Logos: Why Does John Call Jesus the Word?
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). The [...]
Hosea & Gomer: Why God Commands a Prophet to Marry a Prostitute
WHEN A MARRIAGE BECOMES A SERMON: ON GOD’S RADICAL LOVE… The command is jarring, even offensive to our modern sensibilities: [...]
Colossians 1:15: How is Jesus the Firstborn of All Creation?
The title “Firstborn of All Creation” is one of Scripture’s most emphatic descriptions of Christ’s pre-eminence, and yet, is often [...]
All of Creation is Groaning: What Does Scripture Mean?
The Apostle Paul presents a remarkable insight in Romans 8:19-22, declaring "the whole creation has been groaning as in the [...]
Freemasonry’s Dark Secrets: A Biblical Analysis
The relationship between Freemasonry and Christianity represents more than just theological controversy—it raises profound spiritual concerns that demand careful examination. [...]
Why Did God Harden Pharaoh’s Heart? The Reformed View
Why did God harden Pharaoh’s heart? Few passages in Scripture present a greater theological challenge than the account of God [...]
