THE DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH

What Does “One Holy Catholic Church” Mean?

ttdf_d3ef645f · · 14 min read

Something slightly awkward happens in a lot of churches on a Sunday morning. The congregation stands to recite the Apostles’ Creed, every voice rolling along together—and then it arrives. “I believe in the holy catholic church.” A few voices go quiet. Someone mouths “Christian” instead. A visitor glances down at the order of service, wondering if they’ve walked into the wrong building.

It’s an understandable flinch. For most people the word catholic means one thing: Rome, the Pope, the Vatican. So why is it sitting there in a creed recited for centuries by churches with no allegiance whatsoever to the papacy?

Here’s the short answer: the catholic of the creed has nothing to do with the Roman Catholic Church. The word is older, broader and far more precious than the confusion suggests—and quietly swapping it for “Christian” gives away something you would almost certainly rather keep. Let’s unpack why.

The Word That Trips People Up

The problem is a collision of two very different words that happen to be spelled the same way.

  • catholic (small “c”)—an ancient adjective meaning universal, describing a quality of the whole church.
  • Catholic (capital “C”)—a proper name for one particular communion of churches, the one led from Rome.

When we recite the creed, we’re using the first. The trouble is that centuries of usage have made the second so dominant the original meaning has all but vanished from everyday hearing. So people do one of two things: they grit their teeth and say the word anyway without quite knowing what they mean, or they replace it. Some hymnals and service sheets now simply print “Christian church.” The intention is good. The instinct to protect the congregation from confusion is kind. But as we’ll see, it trades a mountain for a molehill.

So What Does “Catholic” Actually Mean?

The word comes straight from Greek. Katholikos is built from kata holon, meaning “according to the whole” or “throughout the whole.” In plain English: universal, general, complete.

You won’t find the word itself in the New Testament. But the reality it describes is everywhere—one body, one Lord, one people drawn from every nation. The apostle Paul greets “the church of God… together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 1:2). That is catholicity in a single sentence.

The word attached itself to the church remarkably early. Consider the timeline:

WHENWHOWHAT THEY SAID
AD 110Ignatius of Antioch“Where Jesus Christ is, there is the catholic church”
AD 350Cyril of JerusalemSet out five reasons the church is called catholic—all about its universality
AD 381Council of ConstantinopleWrote catholic into the Nicene Creed
AD 434Vincent of LérinsDefined catholic faith as “what has been believed everywhere, always, by all”

Notice the first date. Ignatius of Antioch used the word around AD 110—roughly 1,400 years before there was any such thing as a “Roman Catholic Church” in the sense we mean today. Cyril of Jerusalem’s five reasons never once mention a bishop of Rome; every one of them is about the church reaching everywhere, teaching everything, and healing everyone. The word was never a Roman invention. It belonged to the whole church first.

“Catholic” Is Not “Roman Catholic”

This is the hinge of the whole matter: The historic churches that came out of the Reformation cheerfully confess the catholic church while flatly denying this means the Roman church. Here’s the distinction laid side by side:

“catholic” (creed)“Catholic” (denomination)
MeaningUniversal; the whole churchOne communion under Rome
First used of the churchc. AD 110As a proper name, chiefly after the Reformation
ScopeEvery place, people and ageA specific institutional body
What you affirmChrist has one worldwide people(Not what the creed is claiming)

There’s a delicious irony hiding here. To insist catholic really means “the church under the one bishop of Rome” is to take a word that means universal and shrink it down to a single city. It’s, if anything, the least catholic definition available. The historic argument runs the other way: the church is catholic precisely because it’s not confined to one see, one culture or one century.

So when did the confusion set in? Largely after the Reformation, when Rome pressed “Catholic” into use as a badge to mark itself off from Protestants. Martin Luther, wanting to spare ordinary German believers the muddle, translated the creed’s word as “Christian.” John Calvin, by contrast, kept the older word “catholic” and refused to surrender it. He was right to hold on. It’s a good word, and it belongs to every believer.

One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic: The Four Marks

In its fuller form, the Nicene Creed confesses “one holy catholic and apostolic church.” Those four words became known as the four marks of the church—the family features that identify Christ’s people wherever they’re found.

MARKWHAT IT MEANSKEY TEXT
OneUnity in Christ, not uniformity under an earthly ruler“one body… one Lord, one faith, one baptism” (Ephesians 4:4–6)
HolySet apart and consecrated in Christ—not sinless, but sanctifiedEphesians 5:25–27
CatholicUniversal across place, people and timeRevelation 7:9
ApostolicBuilt on and faithful to the apostles’ teaching“built on the foundation of the apostles” (Ephesians 2:20)

One point deserves a flag, because it’s a common source of worry. Apostolic doesn’t mean an unbroken chain of ordinations stretching back to Peter—the “laying of hands” from bishop to bishop. It means the church holds fast to apostolic doctrine: the teaching the apostles delivered, now preserved for us in Scripture. A church is apostolic not because of who ordained its ministers, but because of what it believes and preaches.

Universal in Place, People and Time

Catholicity is bigger than most people imagine. It stretches in three directions at once.

  • Across every place. John saw a multitude “from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages” standing before the throne (Revelation 7:9). The church has no home country and no headquarters city.
  • Across every kind of person. In Christ there is “neither Jew nor Greek… slave nor free… male and female” (Galatians 3:28). No class, race or culture is turned away at the door.
  • Across every age. This is the dimension people most often miss. The church runs from the beginning of the world to its end. Augustine of Hippo spoke of the church from Abel—God’s people reaching all the way back to the first believer. The Heidelberg Catechism captures it beautifully, confessing that the Son of God gathers his church “from the beginning of the world to its end.”

That third strand is why reciting the creed is such a quietly thrilling act. When we confess the holy catholic church, we’re not merely nodding at other congregations across town. We’re joining hands with believers on every continent and in every century—a people so vast that no one could number them.

What the Reformers Reclaimed

Here’s where the story takes a turn that surprises many. The leaders of the Reformation didn’t think they were starting a new church or walking out of the catholic church. They believed they were restoring it.

Their charge against Rome wasn’t that Rome was too old, but that it had drifted from the faith once delivered. Reformation, they insisted, isn’t revolution. It’s repair—recovering a catholic truth that had become corroded, not inventing something novel. That conviction is written into the great confessions:

  • The Belgic Confession (Guido de Brès, 1561) describes the “catholic or universal church” as a holy congregation of true believers that “has existed from the beginning of the world and will be to the end,” because Christ is an eternal King who cannot be without subjects.
  • The Westminster Confession distinguishes the invisible catholic church—the whole number of God’s elect across all ages—from the visible church of all who profess the true faith, together with their children. Under the gospel this visible church is no longer penned into one nation, as Israel once was, but is genuinely worldwide.

That visible-and-invisible distinction is the key that frees the word catholic from Rome’s grip. Rome ties the universal church to a single visible institution. The older answer is richer: the truly universal church is ultimately the whole company of the redeemed, known finally to God alone, appearing visibly wherever the gospel is rightly preached and the sacraments rightly administered.

Which raises the obvious question—how do we tell the true church from a false one? The historic answer names three marks of a true church: the pure preaching of the gospel, the right administration of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, and faithful church discipline. Not a postal address in Rome, but the Word, the sacraments and holy order.

“But Didn’t ‘Catholic’ Already Mean Rome?”

It’s the strongest objection, and you’ll meet it online: by the time the creed was written in AD 381, “catholic” supposedly already meant the single institution now led from Rome, so reading it as merely “universal” is a modern dodge. Four short replies dismantle it:

  • The plain meaning was always “universal.” That is the undisputed root sense, and it governs how the early teachers used the word.
  • It marked out truth, not Rome. Where “catholic” distinguished the orthodox from heretics, it did so by right doctrine—which is exactly the point being made here.
  • Rome held no universal rule then. In the fourth century the bishop of Rome had no authority over the Eastern churches, and it was Eastern bishops who framed and signed the creed. They were plainly not confessing submission to a pope.
  • The Roman reading is self-defeating. It turns a word meaning universal into a word meaning this one particular city—the very opposite of what it says.

Why It Matters Every Time We Say It

So why not just print “Christian” and spare everyone the bother? Because the swap costs more than it saves.

  • It shrinks our faith. “Catholic” pushes back against the lonely, sectarian instinct that says it’s just me and my Bible or just my little church. We belong to something enormous.
  • It roots us in history. We’re not newcomers. We stand in a line of the faithful two thousand years deep (Hebrews 12:22–23).
  • It fuels mission. The gospel is the property of no single culture. A church that grasps its catholicity wants the whole world in.
  • It breeds humility. We share the great essentials with every true believer in Christ, across the lines that divide the visible church.

Christ himself promised, “I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). To confess the holy catholic church is simply to take him at his word: one people, in every place, through every age, that no power in heaven or earth can destroy. That’s not a word to mumble past. It’s a word to reclaim.

Reclaiming the Word

So the next time we reach that line in the creed, let’s not drop our voice or reach for a substitute. Let’s say it with confidence. To confess the holy catholic church is to declare Jesus Christ has one people—gathered from every nation, every walk of life and every century since the world began—and that we, by grace, belong to it.

The word was never Rome’s to keep, and it isn’t ours to surrender. It’s the joyful confession that the multitude no one can number, standing before the throne, is real; that the gates of hell will not prevail against it; and that our name, if we are in Christ, is written among them. That’s a mountain. “Christian” church, however well meant, is by comparison a molehill. Take back the word.

Tough Questions, Honest Answers

Is the word “catholic” actually in the Bible?

No—the word itself never appears in Scripture. But that’s no strike against it, because plenty of cherished theological words (like “Trinity”) aren’t in the Bible either, while the truth they describe fills its pages. Scripture teems with the reality of a single, worldwide, age-spanning church even though the label came later. The word is simply useful shorthand for something the Bible teaches from cover to cover.

What’s the difference between the Apostles’ Creed and the Nicene Creed?

The Apostles’ Creed is the shorter and older in form, growing out of the questions put to new believers at baptism, and it says simply “the holy catholic church.” The Nicene Creed, finalised in AD 381, is longer and more precise, hammered out to defend the deity of Christ against heresy, and it expands the phrase to “one holy catholic and apostolic church.” Both are used across the worldwide church, and they don’t compete—they complement one another. Think of the Nicene Creed as the Apostles’ Creed with the doctrinal detail turned up.

Did the apostles actually write the Apostles’ Creed?

Despite the name, no—the twelve apostles did not sit down and compose it. A charming medieval legend had each apostle contributing one line, but historians find no basis for it. The creed earned its title because it faithfully summarises apostolic teaching, not because the apostles penned it. Its wording developed gradually in the early centuries, reaching its familiar form several hundred years after the apostles had died.

Does the Eastern Orthodox Church also claim to be the “catholic” church?

Yes, and this is telling. The Eastern Orthodox confess “one holy catholic and apostolic church” every bit as firmly as anyone, and they too reject the idea that catholicity means submission to Rome. The very existence of an ancient, enormous body of Christians who use the word while denying the papal claim shows that “catholic” was never Rome’s private property. It is a shared inheritance of the whole church, East and West alike.

What does “the communion of saints” mean—the line right after?

In the Apostles’ Creed, “the communion of saints” follows immediately after “the holy catholic church,” and the two belong together. “Saints” here doesn’t mean a special canonised elite; in the New Testament it simply means all of God’s set-apart people, ordinary believers included. The phrase confesses that all who belong to Christ share a real fellowship with one another and with him. It’s the warm, personal side of catholicity—the family bond that unites the whole universal church.

Did the early church believe in the pope?

Not in the form Rome later developed. In the first centuries the bishop of Rome was one respected leader among several great centres—alongside Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem and Constantinople—not a universal monarch over them all. The claim to supreme jurisdiction over the entire church grew over many centuries and was firmly resisted, especially in the East. So the early church’s catholicity simply cannot be equated with obedience to a pope who did not yet hold that role.

If we don’t need Rome, why bother with ancient creeds at all?

Because a creed is not a rival to Scripture—it’s a faithful summary of it. Saying “no creed but Christ” is itself a tiny creed, and a slippery one, since everyone summarises their beliefs somehow. The historic creeds simply do the job carefully, drawing a clear line between Christian faith and the counterfeits, and binding us to believers of every era who confessed the same words. They carry real authority, not because they stand over the Bible, but because they accurately restate what the Bible teaches.

Related Reads

Truths To Die For

Reformed answers to life’s hardest questions, delivered fortnightly.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

These articles are free because of the generous support of our readers.

Support Us →